Some have asked me about my views on a "postmodern" christianity, if there is such a thing. Well, postmodern itself, as I have come to understand it, is a general rejection of certainty and/or Universal Truth, and instead embracing the multi-faceted viewpoints and faith systems that encompass the globe. Doesn't that seem to run counter to the rock-solid Universal Truth doctrines of Christianity?
Well, perhaps, perhaps not. But hang on. There's much more to the story.
Globalization has brought worldwide ideas that contradict and overlap each other. People start asking "what if everything I ever knew was wrong and this other idea was right?" The question then morphs into "What if EVERYTHING is right?"
This is the dillemma of the postmodern world. Many of us here on Zaadz hold to this view, which is fantastic because it helps people build better lives and increases cooperation, understanding, and lives of peace. But surprisingly, the most unlimited belief system has its limits. With so many options correct, how do you move forward? How do you justify studying only a few and not study them all? How do you try it out to see if it works for you, if it sometimes takes a lifetime to master a faith?
I too believed not too long ago that every single path was truth and all leaded to One God. This was before I even thought about becoming a Christian -- I mean, how can one man claim to have the ultimate truth over everyone elses? Why would anyone pick Jesus out of the multitude of master teachers and religious figures?
Even as a Christian now, I can still say there is validity and truth to a myriad of belief systems. And even Christianity doesn't encompass everything there can be known about God -- we need these different perspectives to help piece together a gigantic picture of what is essentially the most gigantic thing of all: God, who is much too big to fit into one religion.
So why am I a Christian?
Ironically, it's that very postmodern view of "all paths are valid" that led me to Christianity and allowed me to take that first step. I viewed different religions as different languages to communicate with God. And after learning a few languages (ofmormonism, of atheism, of new-age-ism), I still found myself, even during the agnostic and new age phases of my life, raising my eyes to the sky and crying out "Lord!"
I didn't know why I did this. If it was out of habit, I would be crying "Heavenly Father" as my Mormon upbringing told me to do. There must be something inside myself that needs this name to call on. What was it? A cultural meme I picked up on? This "Lord" fellow floating around in the sky?
In my postmodern way of thinking, I asked, "why this guy? because it was in my American culture? what if I was born in China and learned nothing but buddhism?"
But then I thought... well, why not?
I mean, what if He was a real deity? and what if i decided to make such good out of my life, using jesus's life as a pattern for my own? could I? it certainly would be a step forward than where i was at, stagnant and unsure how to move forward at all.
I am not the type of person who can learn 16 different foreign languages fluently. Why CAN'T I choose this guy to be my religious language? and besides, if i die and find that jesus wasn't a real guy, does it really matter? i mean, REALLY? will there be a god tearing me from limb to limb because i didn't believe in the "right" god?
the ultimate answer... no.
a loving god, the god I believe in, wouldn't do that to an open, honest, seeking human being who only does the best with what knowledge she's given.
that is a serious flaw in traditional christianity -- believing you'll be sent to hell because you didn't believe in the right god. and it's a flaw that's sought to be rectified by what's called "the emergent church." a postmodern answer to the typical christian church.
But it's not postmodern in and of itself.
Because in order to pick up the faith of Christianity, you need to really, honestly believe that Truth is embodied by one man named Jesus, and that he is The Way, The Truth, and the Life, and no one can enter heaven except through him.
I had some troubles with this one. I really had struggles. But as I thought about it more, I imagined, in heaven, a bright light named Jesus, standing in between souls entering heaven and heaven itself. You can't miss him, he's too bright, too loving, too pure to leave any one of us alone. He may not introduce himself as such, because many souls out there are so disenfranchised with what wicked people have done to His name, and he would understand that heaven is not a place to feel uncomfortable. But he is there, he is shining with unparalleled love and light, undeniable to anyone who saught their eternal rest.
Thinking about the "The Way the Truth and the Life" more... I realized that I was disagreeing bit by bit with the whole concept of "every path is right." Not just because of the scripture, but just due to logic. No, you shouldn't believe that one tank of gas will drive you from California to New York. That path isn't right -- well, not at this present physical moment in time. You SHOULDN'T believe that you should kill and hurt and lie and steal your way to heaven. That isn't right. That can't be.
And for the first time in recent memory, I used the words "right" and "wrong" to describe a belief system.
I had read Conversations with God, and the key topic I remember was its care to use "That Which Serves You" and "That Which Doesn't Serve You" instead of wrong and right. Fear is the opposite of Love, it said, and Fear is an illusion.
Ultimately, I still believe this. In the existence of the Absolute, where God resides, this is true. But we're here on earth, hello. We are in the world of the Relative. And there's a very very good reason for that: WE NEED to discover and build upon ourselves the right and the wrong. Those words are tools, not enemies. Forward, backward, good, bad, righteousness and sin, we need these things to function. You can't just erase the bad and pretend you live in eternal happiness. You don't. There's pain here, the fear is real, there's bad stuff alongside the good. We need both positive AND negative energies to propel us forward. Harmony's nice and soft. But arguments and discordance are an essential tool to GETTING anywhere!
I found in myself the need for something more solid than "everything is right," for myself. I wanted a design template. I wanted external guidance. Being my own god was really shitty. I coudn't decide on anything, there was too much weight on my shoulders, and matter-of-factly, I simply wasn't God! I could accept that I was a PIECE of god who can communicate with something greater than myself, but I'm not the All-Seeing All-Knowing God that new-age has taught me that I am. I don't know what's going on across the globe, I didn't design the sharks swimming in the sea, nor the food chain and complex ecosystem in which they live. I don't even know what's going on inside my body! Some have a theory that I may have done just that: my soul existed before the world was being created and I designed the sharks with God. I may even buy into this theory, but that doesn't change the fact that who I am now is simply not big enough to be God. I was not designed to be.
I needed right and wrong. I needed an external hand to hold, a name to call out, to thank, to pray to, to cry to. I don't know about other people's structures, but my own divine design was recognizing what I sorely lacked. The real God, not this self-centered version of a demigod I was worshipping all along -- me.
And my language already knew. My heart knew I could make this jesus path work. My soul pushed me forward on this path, finally, forward.
I was surfing the spiritual equivalent of 5,000 TV channels, and I was tired of it. I wanted to stick with one and watch it through. I wanted to reject the consumer mentality of "shopping" for a belief system, and I felt a call well up within me. I knew my religious language, I knew there was a solid ground available if I would but step out and let it catch me. I knew Jesus. I liked him, the real him. It was only a matter of time when I would confess that I loved him.
Now don't get me wrong -- if there's something beaming through on the Christian channel that I know is wrong, I will still switch channels. I am still deeply interested in the points of view shown on other channels, to better define what it is that makes up this idea of God worldwide. But I just do not have the mental capacity, or the interest, to watch 5,000 channels equally.
I'm not replacing the "consumer" mentality with a strict "use only this product as it is, now and forever" mentality. What I'm doing, instead of being an inactive channel-surfer, is I'm trying to break my way into television programming. And I want to fix the crap on the Christian channel that I know is wrong. The lack of femininity, the outright condemnation of other beliefs, the neglect of Mother Nature, the homosexual persecutions, the mistaken notion that Christian Equals Right-Wing Radical.
I can't make these kinds of overhauls without completely immersing myself with that very weighted label... "Christian."
I used to hate labels. I would associate the word "label" with "prejudice" and "bigotry." Now I take a much more open approach: like using love and fear as tools, I am using these labels as tools too.
Human brains can only allow so much information, and prejudice (pre-judging) is a natural byproduct. If I told you the world's top lawyer were to come into the room right now, you would not imagine a 3-month-old infant. This is a useful shortcut your brain makes and is a logical pre-judgment. However, if a black man came in the room and your brain expected a white man, that is not a useful shortcut, and it needs to be reprogrammed.
The black man is using that lawyer "label" to his advantage. He is now reprogramming what you thought about his race and identity. He is making a small change in the world, replacing a mistaken idea with a more open one.
This is what I want to do with the label Christian.
I hope, this is what I AM doing.